Speculation re-enchants collectivities by projecting broken promises onto shared futures

Evidence

If all this seems nonsensical, that is because at the heart of this logic lies a paradox. What do speculative agents stand to gain from their wholehearted acceptance of failed promises if not their inclusion in capitalism’s reward system? In what follows, I suggest that while the speculative imagination leaves a set of political promises unfulfilled, it does nonetheless project those broken promises onto a collective realm that is conjured around new political myths and shared narratives of the future. In doing so, speculation pries open possibilities that swell over social and political life. As I will show in part 3, this radically different understanding of speculating subjects and their motivations can lead to both regressive and progressive “collectivizations” of uncertainty—­and to different corresponding types of speculative communities. Speculation absolves uncertainty by breathing new life into social groups that have suffered loss of certainty, security, and stability, thus re-­enchanting collectivities. — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities, 96

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Core thesis statement defining speculation as ‘endorsing a failed promise’ and ‘collectivizations’ of uncertainty — the chapter’s key conceptual move.
  • SEED: Article angle: speculation as a form of collective re-enchantment — how financial uncertainty redistributes political belonging rather than merely economics.
  • XREF: connects to: Speculative imagination generates collective futures under incalculable uncertainty; Anderson’s imagined-communities framework applies to speculative finance and collective imaginings. — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living with…, 55; Speculation now pervades economic, social, and political life as an imagined collective enactment — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living With…, 85 (+3 more)

Broader Connections