Southern officials mounted coordinated legislative and political resistance to Brown across multiple states

Evidence

Opponents of Brown appealed to public opinion, seeking to inflame hostility toward the Supreme Court and desegregation. The most influential of these appeals was the congressional “Southern Manifesto,” signed by more than 100 Southern senators and representatives, which denounced Brown as an abuse of judicial authority and pledged to overturn it “by all lawful means.” School boards masked their intransigence in inaction, offering ingenious justifications for delay instead of desegregation plans. State legislatures enacted laws designed to fortify segregation and discourage desegregation. A Louisiana law, for example, denied promotion or graduation to any student of a desegregated school, and a Georgia law deprived police officers of their retirement and disability benefits if they failed to enforce the state’s segregation laws. From 1954 to 1957 alone, Southern states enacted more than 130 new laws and constitutional amendments designed to preserve segregation. — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 2991

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Delegating implementation to local judges enabled Southern delay of desegregation — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 2978; Congressional funding incentives, not Brown alone, produced Southern school desegregation. — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1550; After Roe the Court stayed active policing abortion law, unlike after Brown. — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1621 (+5 more)

Broader Connections