Digital Mind 🧠

🪵 The Threshold
Home

❯

01-Claims

❯

Sound masking extends in time before and after the masker

Sound masking extends in time before and after the masker

Properties1
tagsja-picks

Sep 20, 20262 min read

Sound masking extends in time before and after the masker

Related

  • Masking effectiveness depends on masker-signal power, frequency, and timing relationships (similarity 0.88)
  • Sounds can mask both slightly earlier and later probe sounds (similarity 0.87)
  • Sounds mask both preceding and following sounds but forward masking dominates. (similarity 0.87)
  • Masking thresholds can be transformed into time functions of specific loudness (similarity 0.86)
  • A masker can mask sounds occurring before it is switched on. (similarity 0.86)
  • Masking can occur even when the masker follows the test sound in time. (similarity 0.85)
  • Temporal masking patterns comprise simultaneous, post, and premasking effects (similarity 0.85)
  • Non-simultaneous masking lets sounds mask others at temporal offsets, not only together (similarity 0.84)
  • A masker’s intensity, frequency content, and temporal pattern determine its masking capability. (similarity 0.84)
  • Postmasking can last up to 200 milliseconds after a masker ends (similarity 0.84)
  • Masking-period patterns reveal how masker phase within its period affects audibility (similarity 0.84)
  • Forward masking measures temporal processing between distinct sounds. (similarity 0.84)
  • Amounts of masking are expressed as dB differences, not absolute dB SPL levels. (similarity 0.84)
  • Forward masking presents masker before signal so the two never overlap in time (similarity 0.83)
  • Masking occurs before, during, and after a masker is present. (similarity 0.83)

✉️
  • Sound masking extends in time before and after the masker
  • Related

Backlinks

  • A masker raises the audibility threshold of a test sound.
  • A time delay of a reflection imprints a comb of enhanced and suppressed frequencies
  • Amounts of masking are expressed as dB differences, not absolute dB SPL levels.
  • Delay loudspeakers should lag the acoustic signal by about 15 ms
  • Forward masking measures temporal processing between distinct sounds.
  • Forward masking persists up to 200 ms after the masker ends
  • Hearing loss extends internal masker persistence and shrinks duration benefits
  • Hearing masks sounds before they occur via slower and faster sensory build-up times
  • Listeners vary widely in how long masking persists across time.
  • Loud flanking syllables immediately preceding a soft target induce forward masking
  • Loud maskers can paradoxically improve audibility at condensation peaks.
  • Masking effectiveness depends on masker-signal power, frequency, and timing relationships
  • Masking measured within the efferent onset delay isolates gain reduction cleanly
  • Masking noise prevents listeners from using unintended spectral cues
  • Masking thresholds can be transformed into time functions of specific loudness
  • Perception completes masked vocal phrases using semantic context to make them continuous
  • Postmasking can last up to 200 milliseconds after a masker ends
  • Prolonged forward masking makes vowels mask consonants in impaired ears
  • Sound perception decays slowly and can mask a following sound
  • Sounds can mask both slightly earlier and later probe sounds
  • Sounds mask both preceding and following sounds in time