Sonic maps by measured sound pressure fail to capture what a soundscape actually is

Evidence

The actual sonic maps are based on instrumental recording of the sound pressure, but depicting a soundscape requires a more integrated approach not easily transferred into visual maps. — Almo Farina, Soundscape Ecology, 2247

Categorization

• XREF: Reinforces the earlier claim that surface noise-level reduction fails to improve perceived sonic environments and that soundscape is a cognitive construct, not decibel reality. — connects to: Decibel-based annoyance measurement fails to capture urban sonic quality — Almo Farina, Soundscape Ecology: Principles,…, 949; Physical sound measurement cannot capture the subjective semantic meaning of a sonic environment — Almo Farina, Soundscape Ecology: Principles,…, 1159; Soundscape quality depends on wanted-versus-unwanted context, not decibel level — Almo Farina, Soundscape Ecology: Principles,…, 1452 (+4 more)
• recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections

• Physical accuracy of a sound field does not predict perceived accuracy #corroborates (0.92) — Ville Pulkki, Matti Karjalainen, Communication Acoustics- An…, 1902
• Perceived loudness does not map one-to-one onto acoustic amplitude #corroborates (0.85) — David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 616
• Expanding auditory imagination beyond physical hearing range reveals new sonic worlds #expands (0.75) — Pauline Oliveros, Deep Listening, 337