Some prejudices involve positive affect combined with low respect

Evidence

Late twentieth-century research made clear that some prejudices are not marked by negative attitudes. Empirical work not only documented subtle, “modern” prejudices toward many racial and ethnic minorities, but also revealed positive attitudes toward women, who are better liked even if less respected than men. These prejudices are ambivalent, not uniformly hostile. — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 180

Empirical work not only documented subtle, “modern” prejudices toward many racial and ethnic minorities, but also revealed positive attitudes toward women, who are better liked even if less respected than men. These prejudices are ambivalent, not uniformly hostile. — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 180

Categorization

• XREF: Connects to ambivalent sexism theory (Glick & Fiske), benevolent vs. hostile sexism, and the ‘better liked but less respected’ finding that reappears in studies of warm-but-incompetent stereotypes. — connects to: Greater explicit positivity toward women rules out the attitude interpretation of male-name favoritism. — Anthony G. Greenwald and Mahzarin R. Banaji, Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes,…, 206
• SEED: Article angle: the warm-but-incompetent stereotype as a modern, often-unnoticed form of prejudice — how liking someone can still be derogation.
• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 180; , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 180