Somalia stayed non-aligned and aid-rich despite the N.F.D. loss

Evidence

Somali governments during the first seven years of independence stayed true to the idea of neutrality, although that is not what the world powers wanted to hear. — Abdi Ismail Samatar, Africa’s First Democrats, 1389 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Although the United Nations ‘experiment’ in Somalia, as it has often been called, had certainly succeeded in providing the new state with an effective administrative and political framework, neither the southern nor the northern regions were yet economically viable. In recognition of their outstanding economic requirements both former colonial powers had agreed to continue to supply aid and assistance. Britain had promised £1-1/2 million for the first year after independence, and thereafter an annually negotiable amount. This financial aid was accompanied by a six months’ programme of technical assistance such that Britain would for six months continue to pay the salaries of those former colonial officials who elected, at the request of the Somali government, to stay on after independence. Italy promised a more substantial annual grant of about £3 million, paid partly in the form of salaries to a team of Italian ‘experts’ serving with the Somali government. The commercial link between the two countries, which brought the southern regions into the European Common Market, was to be continued through the banana monopoly and the heavy dependence of Somalia upon Italy for imported goods. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 423 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Somalia became independent despite not being economically viable; Somalia maintained nonalignment during its first seven years; Post-independence Somalia remained economically dependent on British and Italian aid — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 423 (+2 more)

Broader Connections