Somali factions used the terror threat to denounce each other rather than unite

Evidence

Following menacing media statements and rumours from U.S. sources, in anticipation of an impending American attack, the contending factions vied with each other in declaring their innocence of fundamentalist connections while accusing their rivals. T.N.G. president ‘Abdulqassim announced his eagerness to collaborate with the US in hunting down terrorists (and, with an eye to American tastes perhaps, even managed to round up a few unconvincing suspects in the shape of four or five Iraqi cooks). The S.S.R.C. went even further in calling for international military intervention to deal with radical Islamic groups, pointing a finger at the Arta group. Of course, as we have seen, there were some fundamentalist figures in the T.N.G. and elsewhere in Mogadishu and, as the city was subjected to menacing, low-flying U.S. surveillance operations, Somalis jokingly reported how many residents had prudently shaven off their beards and disappeared into the bush. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 699

Categorization

  • XREF: The factions’ splintering under external threat echoes the pattern throughout the book of clan politics fragmenting even against foreign incursions. — connects to: UN successors abandoned direct diplomacy, deepening mutual mistrust with Somali factions.; Somali political fragmentation and lack of firearms prevented united resistance to Egypt — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 145; Somalis’ clan disunity prevented unified opposition to foreign rule (+3 more)

Broader Connections