Socioeconomic and political conditions affect women’s rights far more than Islam itself

Evidence

Sociologist Valentine Moghadam has demonstrated with ample data that the conditions for women in the MENA region vary widely. Outlining the role of women as agents of change working within constraining conditions, she shows how it is not “Islam” that impacts women’s rights but socioeconomic and political conditions. Yet a particular image of the Muslim woman animates imperial feminism, which among other things erases MENA region and South Asian women’s activism and advocacy. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 289

Categorization

  • XREF: Parallels the ‘Complaints About Immodesty Go Way Back’ claim that moral panics over dress trace to class and political signaling rather than culture itself. — connects to: Abstract legal recognition of rights fails to overturn women’s concrete economic inferiority — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 57; Women’s legal equality arose from economic shifts, not ideology or religion. — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 209; Woman’s status as privileged Other depends on specific social and political conditions — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 320 (+5 more)
  • QUESTION: Worth chasing Moghadam’s precise data — which indicators of women’s status vary, and do any correlate inversely with religiosity?

Broader Connections