Social security’s architecture was built on private risk-management and gendered-entitlement assumptions

Evidence

For Levy (2012), even social security “was dependent upon the instruments of corporate risk management” (314). It was thus “an extension of the insurance principle” and hence “predicated upon notions of male individual entitlement and right rather than the shared obligations of a truly national risk community, solidified by an egalitarian ethos of citizenship” (314). — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities, 692

Categorization

  • SEED: Fertile angle: the welfare state’s insurance logic was never a pure national-risk community but an extension of corporate actuarial practice and male-entitlement norms — an essay on the actuarial origins of social security.
  • XREF: connects to: Social Security avoided controversy because it evaded racial and gender politics — Dieter Plehwe, Quinn Slobodian & Philip Mirowski (eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, 234; Social security was built on corporate risk-management logic, not egalitarian citizenship. — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living with…, 692; American welfare opponents framed socialized risk as a threat to family morality (+9 more)

Broader Connections