So-called sensory relativity is really objective contradiction resolved by free choice.

Evidence

A sense is not given before sensible objects. For is it not capable indeed of appearing as an object to the Other? Neither is it given after sensible objects; for in that case it would be necessary to suppose a world of incommunicable images, simple copies of reality the mechanism of whose appearance was inconceivable. The senses are contemporaneous with objects; they are things “in person” as they are revealed to us in perspective. They represent simply an objective rule of this revelation. Thus sight does not produce visual sensations; neither is it affected by light rays. It is the collection of all visible objects in so far as their objective and reciprocal relations all refer to certain chosen sizes—submitted to all at once—as measures, and to a certain center of perspective. — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, 856 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: The psyche becomes a real situation that conditions free choices; Perception cannot be proportional to stimulus across its full range. — Eric J. Heller, Why You Hear What You Hear- An…, 1996; Only free choice can resolve an indeterminate chain of mutual objectification (+4 more)

Broader Connections

• Only free choice can resolve an indeterminate chain of mutual objectification #corroborates (0.85)
• Philosophers err in assigning sense-organ relativity to my being rather than being-for-others. #corroborates (0.85)
• Senses are not subjective channels but objective rules of worldly revelation. #corroborates (0.85) — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, 856
• Perception cannot be proportional to stimulus across its full range. #contradicts (0.80) — Eric J. Heller, Why You Hear What You Hear- An…, 1996
• The psyche becomes a real situation that conditions free choices #expands (0.75)
• Perceptual ambiguity is a necessary, unwilled structure of embodied existence. #complicates (0.75) — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre, 67
• Believing contradictions works because the mind can simply exclude the conflicting object from attention #qualifies (0.72) — Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings, 618