Shared language and religion did not protect Egyptians from degradation in Mahdist Sudan

Evidence

The Mahdïya in the Sudan created new heroes for the pan-Islamic move- ment. By 1883, the forces of the Mahdï were imposing defeat after defeat on Egyptian troops, with some startling victories over regiments commanded by British officers. The Mahdïya’s forces decried the rule of the “Turks,” their word for the Circassian-led Egyptian army, for their religious laxness, for their economic exploitation of the Sudan, and for the disruption of the slave trade in the late 1870s. Although they cursed Egyptians, the Mahdï and his forces began to attract a great deal of favorable attention within Egypt itself. — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 454 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Cf. Fawzï Pasha, Kitäb al-südän bayna aydï Gordon wa Kitchener, 2:61, 142, 260. 53. Ibid., 1:95. 54. Bedri, The Memoirs of Babikr Bedri, p. 24, n. 1.The note explains that in the Mahdist Sudan the term Turk had no “precise ethnic significance” and was later transferred to the Anglo-Egyptian elite. — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 1144 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

Broader Connections

  • Sudanese Mahdist forces denounced Egyptian rule for religious and economic exploitation. #qualifies (0.50) — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 454
  • In Mahdist Sudan the label Turk carried no precise ethnic meaning #expands (0.40) — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 1144