Self-branding’s core contradiction is demanding authenticity for a market audience.

Evidence

Most academics are quite disparaging of self-branding. They argue that practitioners remake themselves as products to be sold to large corporations, that they rely on an imaginary sense of what employers might want, and that they sully personal feelings and relationships with market forces. Self-branding, while widely taken up in the tech scene, is inherently contradictory. It promotes both “authenticity” and business-targeted self-presentation. This incongruity creates tension and stress for practitioners, who must engage in emotional labor and self-surveillance to ensure an appropriate branded persona. — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update, 420

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the central tension of self-branding: it demands both authenticity and market-targeted self-presentation, which creates emotional labor and self-surveillance.
  • XREF: Connects to Hochschild’s emotional labor and to the broader critique of the authenticity economy. — connects to: Authenticity in self-branding means displaying hidden inner life, not mere honesty — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 285; Self-branding demands maintaining an edited yet authentic self before an audience — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 507; Young people must curate their identities as authentic brands online. — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 658 (+3 more)

Broader Connections