Scholarship universalized white women and black men while erasing black women

Evidence

Scholars usually talked about black experience when they were really speaking solely about black male experience. Significantly, I found that when “w om en” were talked about, the experience of white women was universalized to stand for all female experience and that when “black people” were talked about, the experience of black men was the point of reference. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress, 221

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to intersectionality literature — Crenshaw and hooks on the double-erasure of black women in both white feminism and black male-centered scholarship. — connects to: The women-and-blacks analogy erased black women by equating women with whites; White-scholarship findings about women workers were misapplied to Black women — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 229; White feminist scholars aligned with white men’s critical standards at black women’s expense (+7 more)

Broader Connections