Said’s work embodies the contradictions of the literary theory tradition

Evidence

This is not the place to indicate the complexity of the thematics of that chapter, but it is worth emphasizing that within the trends I examine in this book, Said’s reuvre is by far the most magisterial, the most influential but also possibly the most ridden with ambivalence and inner contradictionin particular texts, between one text and another, and between the earlier and later phases of his work. So his work exemplifies, very starkly, virtually all the main moments in the evolution of literary theory which I trace in the book as a whole. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 68

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Readers overstate the comparative scope actually present in Said’s work — Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism: A Critique of…, 814; Said’s theory contradicts itself by denying writers any determining imprint. — Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism: A Critique of…, 60; Said’s critique of Orientalism relies on the same modernist assumptions that produced it — Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism: A Critique of…, 476 (+5 more)

Broader Connections