Room resonances shift from isolated to overlapping at the Schroeder frequency
Evidence
If the anechoic loudspeaker data do not reveal evidence of resonances, fluctuations in steady-state room curves are almost certainly attributable to acoustical interference. It is highly improbable that the propagation path from the loudspeaker to the microphone/listener contains a potent acoustical resonance mechanism above the transition frequency. β , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-β¦, 412 (
#expands, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Room resonances necessarily overlap because isolating them would require impossible Q values.; Above the transition frequency room-curve wiggles are interference, not resonances β , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-β¦, 412; Room acoustics shift from standing waves to irregular interference as frequency rises β , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-β¦, 626 (+7 more)
Broader Connections
- Above the transition frequency room-curve wiggles are interference, not resonances
#expands(0.92) β , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-β¦, 412 - A transition frequency separates modal from ray acoustical behavior in rooms
#expands(0.90) β Toole, Floyd E, Sound reproduction- the acoustics andβ¦, 475 - Driving point reveals whether a resonance peak is isolated or overlapping
#expands(0.90) - At high frequencies rooms act as irregular interference fields rather than standing-wave patterns
#expands(0.90) - Room acoustics shift from standing waves to irregular interference as frequency rises
#qualifies(0.85) β , Toole, Floyd E - Sound reproduction-β¦, 626 - Modal decay analysis governs room acoustics below the critical frequency
#expands(0.85) β David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 2038 - Room acoustical behavior changes across a broad transition region, not at one frequency
#complicates(0.84)