Romanticism and medievalism are defense mechanisms against industrial capitalism

Evidence

Romanticism was only new unintentionally: it may indeed be thought of as the way a whole generation attempted to shelter itself, as an organism wards off shock, against that stupendous, total, and unprecedented transformation of the world into the henceforth barren and materialistic environment of middle-class capitalism. All the feudal postures and political daydreams, all the atmosphere of religious and medieval objects, the return as for renewal to older, more hierarchical or primitive societies are therefore to be understood first and foremost as defense mechanisms. — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 195

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly echoes Benjamin’s ‘shock’ concept and the Frankfurt School reading of aesthetic modernism as a response to commodification; connects to Jameson’s broader dialectical method of reading cultural forms as reactions to economic transformation. — connects to: Hemingway’s sentence-craft aestheticizes nonalienated work under industrial capitalism — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 783; Resisting capitalism requires a subjective revolution toward love and unity with nature — Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism: A Critique of…, 499; Capitalism’s material system is interwoven with cultural reproduction — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 122 (+3 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: A compact statement of the dialectical-materialist account of Romanticism as defense mechanism rather than mere reactionary nostalgia — a paradigm for reading any cultural return to the past as symptomatic.

Broader Connections