Romanian austerity in the 1980s contributed to Ceausescu’s violent overthrow

Evidence

In sum, when those at the bottom are expected to pay disproportionately for a problem created by those at the top, and when those at the top actively eschew any responsibility for that problem by blaming the state for their mistakes, not only will squeezing the bottom not produce enough revenue to fix things, it will produce an even more polarized and politicized society in which the conditions for a sustainable politics of dealing with more debt and less growth are undermined. Populism, nationalism, and calls for the return of “God and gold” in equal doses are what unequal austerity generates, and no one, not even those at the top, benefits. In such an unequal and austere world, those who start at the bottom of the income distribution will stay at the bottom, and without the possibility of progression, the “betterment of one’s condition” as Adam Smith put it, the only possible movement is a violent one. Despite what Mrs. Thatcher reportedly once said, not only is there something called society, we all live in it, rich and poor alike, for better and for worse. — Mark Blyth, Austerity, 63 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Austerity-driven military cuts triggered an assassination and coup attempt — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 541; Unequal austerity generates populism, nationalism, and violent movement instead of revenue — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 63

Broader Connections

• Unequal austerity generates populism, nationalism, and violent movement instead of revenue #expands (0.75) — Mark Blyth, Austerity, 63