Revolutionary belonging is temporal and unconditional while nationalist belonging is spatial and exclusionary

Evidence

As opposed to the essentially spatial imaginary of Blue belonging β€” which posits a bounded area, with those inside hostile and suspicious towards those who are excluded β€” Red belonging is temporal and dynamic. It is about belonging to a movement: a movement that abolishes the present state of things, a movement that offers unconditional care without community (it doesn’t matter where you come from or who you are, we will care for you anyway). β€” Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 1866

Categorization

  • XREF: Resonates with the spatial/temporal contrast Fisher draws elsewhere (e.g., capitalist realism, hauntology) and with Lofland’s urban space/identity work. β€” connects to: Cosmopolitan and exclusionary nationalisms differ by future-orientation versus past-orientation β€” John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of…, 1515; Diaspora nationalism can reinforce exclusive and essentialist communal ideologies β€” David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 3010; Diaspora offers an open alternative to defensive nationalist belonging (+6 more)

Broader Connections