Retaining a regional accent resists class subordination because the bourgeoisie share one accent

Evidence

The English bourgeoisie speak in more or less the same accent wherever they come from. The insistence on retaining a regional accent is therefore a challenge to the machineries of class subordination — a refusal to accept being marked as inferior. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 1349

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to sociolinguistic work on accent prejudice and Bourdieu’s linguistic capital — the accent as embodied class marker. — connects to: Retaining a regional accent resists class subordination rather than reactionary localism — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 1349; Regional accents are erased through class-aspirational self-suppression — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 1348; Regional accents signal perceived social class and cultural displacement to listeners. — Hilary Mantel, A Memoir of My Former Self- A Life in…, 48 (+5 more)
  • SEED: Angle on why ‘keeping your accent’ is politically different from other authentic-local appeals — a reversal of the usual mockery of provincialism.

Broader Connections