Resisting capital requires a counter-globalization, not nation-state refusal

Evidence

By unveiling the strategies of power that have informed the process of globalization. Gon’s approach allows us to see the possibilicy for a countcNtrategy. It is of course vain simply to refuse globalization or to attempt resisting it in the context of the nation-state. It is only by opposing to the power of transnational capital another globalization. informed by a different political project, that we could have a chance to resist ncoliberalism succesfullyand to instate a new hegemony. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 528

Categorization

  • XREF: The counter-hegemony via ‘another globalization’ doctrine is Mouffe’s practical proposal; relevant to testing whether her framework can sustain a non-exclusionary ‘we’. — connects to: Opposition to capital must mirror capital’s sufficient globalization and patchwork coordination. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 2219; Globalization was a political move by capital, not a technological fate — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 525; Globalization theory overlooks that nation-states still serve their own capital — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 441 (+6 more)

Broader Connections