Research funding subordinates truth to the goal of performativity

Evidence

The production of proof, which is in principle only part of an argumentation process designed to win agreement from the addressees of scientific messages, thus falls under the control of another language game, in which the goal is no longer truth, but performativity—that is, the best possible input/output equation. The State and/or company must abandon the idealist and humanist narratives of legitimation in order to justify the new goal: in the discourse of today’s financial backers of research, the only credible goal is power. Scientists, technicians, and instruments are purchased not to find truth, but to augment power. — Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition, 342

Categorization

  • XREF: This is Lyotard’s direct claim about why metanarratives fail—the profit motive replaces truth-narratives. Jameson answers by insisting these are still late-capitalist ideology, not genuine emancipation. — connects to: A performativity-driven system defines needs by their value to performance, not by suffering — Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on
, 438; Technical performativity now shapes what counts as scientific truth. — Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on
, 344; Science’s paralogy is the antimodel to the totalizing performativity system — Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on
, 444 (+9 more)
  • SEED: Essay angle: how grant-funding and university performativity metrics literally operationalize Lyotard’s claim—‘scientists are purchased to augment power’ as a description of citation-index culture.

Broader Connections