Regional culture, not selection method, explains interstate differences in judge backgrounds

Evidence

Perhaps the most radical development since Allport concerns his moral evaluation of conformity. Although Allport considered conformity to be a sign of deviance, that stance is no longer held by social psychologists. In fact, conformity is now seen as perhaps the most important normal social process. In 1954, Allport needed to explain why a person might not actively seek individual expression as a weakness of the soul or spirit. Shortly after Allport’s book appeared, however, one of his students, Thomas Pettigrew, embarked on a decades-long program of research on normative theory and prejudice. Pettigrew looked at white racial attitudes in the American South and apartheid-era Republic of South Africa (Pettigrew, 1958, 1959). He showed that differences in authoritarian personality could not account for the large regional differences in racial attitudes between North and South in the USA, nor the large national differences in attitudes between the USA, Europe, and South Africa. Instead, Pettigrew has focused on how historical, political, and social factors shape social norms, which in turn play a large role in determining racial attitudes, social policy, and interpersonal conduct (Pettigrew, 1991). — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 1896 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Regional and national racial attitude differences stem from norms, not personality; Regional differences in racial attitudes exceed what personality can explain — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 1896; Race and gender replaced region as top demographic factors in Supreme Court appointments — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 532 (+5 more)

Broader Connections

• Regional and national racial attitude differences stem from norms, not personality #expands (0.75)
• Regional differences in racial attitudes exceed what personality can explain #expands (0.75) — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 1896
• Regional racial differences defy personality-based explanations and track social norms instead #expands (0.75)
• Race and gender replaced region as top demographic factors in Supreme Court appointments #complicates (0.72) — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 532
• Legal training and role orientation partially neutralize judges’ personal beliefs #qualifies (0.72) — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1366
• Reading judicial opinions as cultural productions exposes races’ contested origins #complicates (0.70) — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 364