Readers take pleasure in drawing their own conclusions from concrete details.

Evidence

The first is that the writer must deal in sense detail. The second is that these must be details “that matter.” As a writer of fiction you are at constant pains not simply to say what you mean, but to mean more than you say. Much of what you mean will be an abstraction or a judgment—love requires trust, children can be cruel. But if you write in abstractions or judgments, you are writing an essay, whereas if you let us use our senses and form our own interpretations, we will be involved as participants in a real way. Much of the pleasure of reading comes from the egotistical sense that we are clever enough to understand. When the author explains to us or interprets for us, we suspect that he or she doesn’t think us bright enough to do it for ourselves. — Janet Burroway; Elizabeth Stuckey-French; Ned Stuckey-French, Writing Fiction, Tenth Edition, 97

Categorization

• SEED: The idea that explanatory authors insult the reader’s intelligence could anchor an essay on what makes didactic writing fail.
• XREF: connects to: Accumulated detail plus humanity lets readers leave history exhilarated rather than leaden — Hilary Mantel, A Memoir of My Former Self- A Life in…, 720; General audience writing fosters deeper reader engagement through narrative structure. — Tilar J Mazzeo, How to Write a Bestseller, 198

Related

• Accumulated detail plus humanity lets readers leave history exhilarated rather than leaden (similarity 0.79)
• Writers start as constant readers fascinated by the artifice of shape and falsification. (similarity 0.78)

Broader Connections

• Accumulated detail plus humanity lets readers leave history exhilarated rather than leaden #expands (0.70) — Hilary Mantel, A Memoir of My Former Self- A Life in…, 720
• General audience writing fosters deeper reader engagement through narrative structure. #corroborates (0.60) — Tilar J Mazzeo, How to Write a Bestseller, 198