Reaching a projected future never delivers what was awaited, yielding structural disillusion

Evidence

The future does not allow itself to be rejoined; it slides into the Past as a bygone future, and the Present For-itself in all its facticity is revealed as the foundation of its own nothingness and once again as the lack of a new future. Hence comes that ontological disillusion which awaits the For-itself at each emergence into the future. “Under the Empire how beautiful was the Republic!” Even if my present is strictly identical in its content with the future toward which I projected myself beyond being, it is not this present toward which I was projecting myself; for I was projecting myself toward the future qua future—that is, as the point of the reuniting of my being, as the place of the upsurge of the Self. — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, 453

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Crystallizes the structural reason the future cannot be rejoined: projection aimed at the future qua future, not at its content.
  • XREF: This ‘ontological disillusion’ is the mechanism behind Beauvoir’s claim that human projects are inherently doomed yet must be pursued — a core thread of Ethics of Ambiguity. — connects to: The For-itself can only found itself by projecting toward a future it never reaches — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on…, 453; The future is neither fully visible nor invisible but frustrates anticipation by surprise; Temporalized totality is never achieved but flees from itself. (+3 more)
  • SEED: Sartre’s ‘Under the Empire how beautiful was the Republic!’ could anchor an essay on how nostalgia and dissatisfaction arise from the structure of temporal projection rather than from actual comparative qualities of past and present.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The insight that even a fully realized future fails to satisfy because the self projected toward the future qua future is never delivered — a genuinely paradigm-shifting account of why attainment produces disillusion.

Broader Connections