Raising penalty severity theoretically deters crime but complex systems prevent it

Evidence

Deterrence is no humbug: if we jack up real penalties, we will definitely scare away some customers for crime, just as a stiff rise in the price of lettuce or toys scares off some buyers. In the real world, this is a mighty big if. “Severity” is easier said than done. The system is too complex to move easily and quickly. And severe laws can produce nasty, unwanted side effects. All of this makes deterrence hard to measure and hard to predict, and also hard to harness and control. — Lawrence M. Friedman and Grant M. Hayden, American Law, 1135

Categorization

  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
  • XREF: connects to: Punishment deters when its expected cost merely exceeds crime’s benefit — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 154; Certainty, not severity, makes punishment deter because it fixes crime-punishment links in minds — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 157; Feigned punishment could deter crime without real suffering — Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings, 28 (+10 more)

Broader Connections