Radical online openness paradoxically produces a more filtered, self-censored self

Evidence

The only sort of drawback is that I can’t cuss, purely or literally let my hair down in a certain way anymore privately, … because everything I do has to reflect the public image that I need to keep up. That’s the irony of openness, because it’s not so open, right? It’s a manufactured openness in that way, that it’s always filtered. It’s kind of like open source; anybody can take the code and mess around with it but there’s a very structured way of doing it. And you check in and you check out and you sign your name to it. And you have to go through certain meritocratic levels to work on the kernel. It’s not like people can just take the code and just fly with it and open living is the same way. It’s ironic because it’s ultimately less open, in a lot of ways, personally, that’s my experience. — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update, 632

Categorization

  • XREF: The open-source code metaphor for self-presentation echoes Goffman’s front/back stage and resonates with the ‘surveillance as self-curation’ literature (e.g., Foucault’s panopticon, Andrejevic). — connects to: Internet communication reflects rather than transcends offline power relations — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 58; Living publicly online normalizes constant scrutiny of one’s actions — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 382; Revealing more online can paradoxically conceal what one keeps private — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 624 (+6 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The open-source metaphor for the open self is genuinely paradigm-shifting: it reframes radical disclosure not as freedom but as a new, internalized discipline — the kernel/meritocracy structure of public identity.

Broader Connections