Radical groups recruit by supplying the family bond that fractured biological families withheld.

Evidence

Still another former white supremacist noted: “It was like we found family. I mean, my own family had cut me off because of other reasons because they didn’t like my ex-wife. So I didn’t really have family at that point. I didn’t have many friends. I was pretty much living across the country. And we met the [radical group] guys and they were so welcoming and they were so like me that it was, like, all right, this is family right here and we joined.” — Ryan Andrew Brown, Todd C. Helmus, Rajeev Ramchand, Alina I. Palimaru, Sarah Weilant, Ashley L. Rhoades, and Liisa Hiatt (RAND Corporation), Violent Extremism in America, 374

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to the withdrawal-of-conflict hypothesis test — the group did not provoke but supplied what was missing; connects to belonging-as-prevention literature and the earlier chapter’s family-bond theme. — connects to: Extremist groups recruit by supplying the kinship and belonging that members lacked. — Ryan Andrew Brown, Todd C. Helmus, Rajeev Ramchand, Alina I. Palimaru, Sarah Weilant, Ashley L. Rhoades, and Liisa Hiatt (RAND Corporation), Violent Extremism in America:…, 372; Terrorist groups recruit through family and intimate personal bonds that substitute for kin. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4111; Extremist groups sustain membership by offering family-like bonds, power, and mission. — Ryan Andrew Brown, Todd C. Helmus, Rajeev Ramchand, Alina I. Palimaru, Sarah Weilant, Ashley L. Rhoades, and Liisa Hiatt (RAND Corporation), Violent Extremism in America:…, 41 (+3 more)
  • QUESTION: Suggestive that de-radicalization via severing group bonds may re-create the original family void — worth checking if participants described post-exit isolation.

Broader Connections