Racist and liberal framings can converge by homogenizing guilt onto an entire group

Evidence

Thus, the terms of debate ranged between “Islamic triumphalism” on the one hand and an argument about the “proper” location of the proposed center on the other. One is overtly racist while the other appears more reasonable, upholding the Constitution and the right to religion while questioning this particular decision to build a community center in the proposed location. Tacitly or blatantly, both sides were in agreement that Muslims as a whole were connected to and shared blame for the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is how the homogenizing logic of racism works, where the actions of a few individuals are generalized to an entire group. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 661

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • ADDENDUM: Connects to the pattern from ‘Complaints About Immodesty Go Way Back’ where liberal-sounding objections mask the same underlying prejudice as overt bigotry.