Quakers show extreme collective individualism paired with social regulation of private life

Evidence

As a whole, as a religious principle of the most extreme individualism and subjectivism, Quakerism binds members of the congregation to a style of life and a mode of being that are highly uniform and democratic, seeking to exclude, as far as possible, all individual differences. And in turn, Quakerism lacks all understanding for the higher political union and its goals so that the individuality of the smaller group not only precludes the individuality of the person, but also his commitment to the large group. The specific manifestation of this is as follows: in the affairs of the congregation, in the assemblies of worship, each person may act as preacher and may say whatever he likes whenever he likes. On the other hand, the congregation watches over personal affairs such as marriage, and these cannot occur without the permission of a committee that is appointed to investigate each case. Thus, the Quakers are individual only in collective matters, and in individual matters, they are socially regulated. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 611

Categorization

• SHARE: The Quaker paradox — free speech in worship yet committee control over members’ marriages — is a great dinner-line fact for someone interested in religious sociology.
• CANDY: Quakers: say anything in meeting, can’t marry without committee approval — reversal of expected collectivism/individualism, easy to retell.
• XREF: connects to: Extreme social control occurs in both the widest and narrowest circles simultaneously — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 641; Christian eternal-soul doctrine unites extreme individualism with universal equality — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 693

Related

• Extreme social control occurs in both the widest and narrowest circles simultaneously (similarity 0.79)

Broader Connections

• Extreme social control occurs in both the widest and narrowest circles simultaneously #complicates (0.50) — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 641