Publication credit was used strategically to advertise the Institute’s standing.

Evidence

This took on strategic significance for the current situation, in that the series was able to serve in Germany as evidence of the Institute’s achievements and its strong position in the United States. Adorno and Horkheimer would have preferred the Institute to have been named on the title-page of the Berkeley research, thus presenting it as a collective work by the Institute (produced in co-operation with the Berkeley Public Opinion Study Group). But they had to be satisfied with Adorno’s name appearing at the top of the list of authors, while Horkheimer, as director of the Institute, contributed the foreword to the main volume of Studies in Prejudice. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 427

Categorization

• XREF: Ties to the earlier account of the Institute’s reluctance to be publicly identified with empirical anti-Semitism research. — connects to: Structured reports can layer institutional position over scholarly dissent. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 46
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Structured reports can layer institutional position over scholarly dissent. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 46