Psychiatric journals rejected early Holocaust testimony because it was unverifiable and unbelievable

Evidence

Looking back, Bettelheim wrote in his Surviving: … Unfortunately, for well over a year, this paper was rejected by one after another of the psychiatric and psychoanalytic journals to which I sent it, thinking that they were most likely to be willing to print it. The reasons for rejection varied. Some editors objected because I had not kept written records while in the camps, implicitly revealing that they had not believed a word of what I had written about conditions in the camps. Others refused it because the data were not verifiable, or because the findings could not be replicated. A few came right out and said that both what I claimed were facts and my conclusions were mostly improbable exaggerations. Some addedprobably correctly, as judged by my experience when I tried talking about these matters to professional peoplethat the article would be too unacceptable to their audiences. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 1619

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the broader story of how institutional knowledge production resists traumatic testimony, paralleling Milgram and silence-themed reading on what gets heard. — connects to: Journals rejected Bettelheim’s camp paper because the camps seemed unbelievable — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1619; Psychiatric investigation produces plausible stories, not verifiable truth — Hilary Mantel, A Memoir of My Former Self- A Life in…, 497; World War One atrocity propaganda made the Holocaust’s truth widely disbelieved — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1481 (+1 more)
  • SEED: Article angle: how editorial gatekeeping by scientific journals delayed acceptance of Holocaust testimony, and what this says about the sociology of knowledge and trauma denial.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The reasons for rejection reveal epistemic assumptions: that traumatic testimony without contemporaneous data is suspect, and that audiences’ discomfort legitimizes suppression.

Broader Connections