Prisoner behavior control generated a continuous individualizing knowledge

Evidence

But no doubt the most important thing was that this control and transformation of behaviour were accompanied – both as a condition and as a consequence – by the development of a knowledge of the individuals. When the new prisoner arrived, the Walnut Street administration received a report concerning his crime, the circumstances in which it was committed, a summary of the examinations of the defendant, notes on his behaviour before and after sentence: indispensable elements if one wished to ‘decide what steps will have to be taken to destroy his old habits’. And throughout his detention he would be observed; his conduct would be noted daily and the inspectors – twelve local worthies appointed in 1795 – who, two by two, visited the prison each week, would be kept informed of events, follow the conduct of each prisoner and decide which of them deserved a shortening of his term. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 202

Categorization

  • XREF: The observation-and-record regime is precisely the panoptic surveillance cycle the reader is tracing toward Oceania’s telescreens. — connects to: One observation action suffices to make prisoners police their own behavior permanently — Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings, 59; Partitioned cellular space lets authority track, assess, and control each individual continuously — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 221; All prison-model disputes shared the goal of coercive individualization — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 367 (+5 more)

Broader Connections