Prior problems with a structure do not negate a later sudden event.
Evidence
The conclusion is a non sequitur. — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 1149
Categorization
- corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 1149
Related
- Post hoc and non sequitur fail via different missing connections (similarity 0.82)
- Fallacies in missing disjuncts stem from omitting alternative possibilities (similarity 0.79)
- Two negative premises prevent any logical determination of class relations (similarity 0.78)
- Issues should be framed so that holdings resolve to yes or no. (similarity 0.78)
- Chronological sequence alone never proves causation (similarity 0.78)