President Truman sought to execute congressionally prescribed policy, disputing Black’s framing

Evidence

Mr. Justice Black’s ”opinion of the Court’ says that ”The President’s order does not direct that a congressional policy be executed in a manner prescribed by Congress - it directs that a presidential policy be executed in a manner prescribed by the President.” This was a palpable misstatement of the issue before the Court, was it not? The policies which the President sought to execute were those (1) of securing needed production of steel and (2) of avoiding inflation. Both these policies had been prescribed by Congress. Whatever “prescribing’ the President did related only to the manner of carrying out these policies. Nor was the manner which the President prescribed an invention altogether of his own. The technique of seizure had been approved by Congress in the past and was currently authorized by Congress. The only power to act independently of Congressional authorization which the President had asserted was the power to use this familiar technique of stisure in a fashion different from that which Congress had expressly approved. — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process, 2934

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to the polyad thread on institutional roles — how statutory interpretation and constitutional characterization shape readings of executive action; connects to ch36 on presidential vs congressional power from earlier volumes. — connects to: Reading a statute’s specific procedure as exclusive prohibition is a contested interpretive choice — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 2957; Unsanctioned executive power, if it exists, knows no legal limits — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 2863; Truman pushed civil rights despite white opposition, citing America’s world position — Ibram X. Kendi, Stamped from the Beginning: The…, 914

Broader Connections