Prejudicial content is shaped by historical and linguistic context

Evidence

The discourse-historical approach has not only confi rmed the complexity of prejudiced discursive patterns, but has also suggested that the prejudicial content that expressions of prejudice transmit is largely determined by the historical and linguistic contexts of their emergence — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice, 481

Related

• Prejudices cannot be understood apart from a society’s history and contradictions (similarity 0.80)
• Understanding prejudice requires cultural, not merely psychological, analysis (similarity 0.80)
• Tolerant and prejudiced discourses coexist within the same societies. (similarity 0.80)
• Not all prejudices are alike; each is culturally situated (similarity 0.80)
• Historical context changes the content but not the structure of prejudice (similarity 0.79)
• Prejudice varies with context yet remains predictable from role requirements. (similarity 0.79)
• Understanding prejudice requires locating attitudes in collective symbolic contexts (similarity 0.79)
• Allport’s table of contents structured fifty years of prejudice research (similarity 0.78)
• Prejudice is explained by societal characteristics, not only individual traits (similarity 0.78)
• Prejudice is an interpretive concept lacking fixed definition (similarity 0.78)
• Prejudice arises from multiple interacting levels, not any single cause. (similarity 0.78)
• Prejudice scholars should revisit foundational theory and method rather than only innovate (similarity 0.78)