Digital Mind 🧠

🪵 The Threshold

Prejudice can be controlled by learning cues triggered by past failures

Properties1
tagsja-picks, causal_relationships, singleton, xref, category/causal-relationships

4 min read

Prejudice can be controlled by learning cues triggered by past failures

Evidence

Monteith and her colleagues (Monteith, 1993; Monteith, Ashburn-Nardo, Voils, & Czopp, 2002) argued that low-prejudice people learn to overcome their automatic prejudiced tendencies through self-regulatory outcomes that follow from an awareness of the failure to control stereotyping or prejudice. Specifically, this program of research has revealed that awareness of a prejudiced response elicits not only guilt but other outcomes that enable low-prejudice people to exert control over future, potentially prejudiced responses. These other outcomes include heightened self-focus, a momentary disruption of ongoing behavior coupled with retrospective reflection on why the failure occurred, and careful attention to the stimuli or cues present when the failure occurred. Learning to associate a prejudice-related failure with guilt and self-regulatory mechanisms establishes cues for control (Monteith et al., 2002). When these cues are present in future situations, they lead to an immediate interruption in ongoing behavior and prospective reflection, which leads to response slowing and a careful consideration of how to respond with the goal of preventing a prejudiced response. This work is important because it provides a theoretical account of how controlled processes may be recruited to disrupt automatic processes in the presence of cues for control such that prejudiced responses are prevented and replaced with egalitarian responses. Across a number of experiments, Monteith and colleagues have provided compelling evidence that low-prejudice people can effectively learn to “put the brakes on their prejudices” (see also Kawakami et al., 2000). — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2109 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Monteith and her colleagues (Monteith, 1993; Monteith, Ashburn-Nardo, Voils, & Czopp, 2002) argued that low-prejudice people learn to overcome their automatic prejudiced tendencies through self-regulatory outcomes that follow from an awareness of the failure to control stereotyping or prejudice. Specifically, this program of research has revealed that awareness of a prejudiced response elicits not only guilt but other outcomes that enable low-prejudice people to exert control over future, potentially prejudiced responses. These other outcomes include heightened self-focus, a momentary disruption of ongoing behavior coupled with retrospective reflection on why the failure occurred, and careful attention to the stimuli or cues present when the failure occurred. Learning to associate a prejudice-related failure with guilt and self-regulatory mechanisms establishes cues for control (Monteith et al., 2002). When these cues are present in future situations, they lead to an immediate interruption in ongoing behavior and prospective reflection, which leads to response slowing and a careful consideration of how to respond with the goal of preventing a prejudiced response. This work is important because it provides a theoretical account of how controlled processes may be recruited to disrupt automatic processes in the presence of cues for control such that prejudiced responses are prevented and replaced with egalitarian responses. — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2109 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Prejudice control begins subconsciously via an automatic conflict detection system; Guilt from prejudice failures builds cues that later interrupt biased responding; Low-prejudice people reduce automatic bias by learning to associate failures with guilt and self-regulation — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2109 (+6 more)

Broader Connections

✉️