Predictable sounds carry less information than unpredictable broadband signals

Evidence

How does this relate to an audio signal? Well, consider a sine wave; it sounds pretty boring to listen to because it is very predictable. On the other hand, a piece of music that is jumping around or an instrument whose texture is continuously changing is much more interesting to listen to because it’s more unpredictable or surprising. If we looked at the spectrum of a sine wave, we would find that all the energy is concentrated at one frequency, whereas for the more interesting music signal, it’s spread over lots of frequencies. In fact, the audio signal that carries the most information is either random noise or a single spike that happens at a time you don’t or can’t predict. Interestingly, in both these cases, the spectrum of the signal contains an equal amount of energy at all frequencies. — David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 2593

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • QUESTION: Worth chasing: the claim that random noise and an unpredictable single spike both have flat spectra yet feel wholly different perceptually — the mechanism linking flat-spectrum to maximal information isn’t fully unpacked.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s existing notes on keynote sounds vs. signal sounds from The Soundscape — predictability directly parallels how keynotes recede from perception.