Power and language are not disembedding mechanisms like money

Evidence

I do not accept the main framework of their analyses. Neither power nor language is on a par with money or other disembedding mechanisms. Power and the use of language are intrinsic features of social action on a very general level, not specific social forms. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 66

Categorization

  • QUESTION: This is Giddens’s direct disagreement with Parsons and Luhmann treating power/language as circulating media — worth contrasting with the reader’s use of Luhmann on trust.
  • XREF: connects to: Money and dialectic are secondary codifications that double a medium’s options; Money and love codes neutralize direct power by separating sanctions; Informal human-relation influence cannot substitute for technicalized formal power. (+11 more)

Broader Connections