Postwar racial myths functioned as labor discipline for capital

Evidence

The stakes had been high during the decades of the post bellum. As Thomas Rainboro had seen it in England’s convulsive seventeenth century, the question posed in the years following the American Civil War was “Either poverty must use democracy to destroy the power of property, or property in fear of poverty will destroy democracy.” As ideologues for both victorious northern industrial capital and a now chastened southern agrarian capital, the white intelligentsia—academician and otherwise—rewove social and historical legends that accommodated the exploitative projects of those ruling classes. … Complemented by the terror of state militias, company police, and security agents, the persistent threats of immigration controls, the swelling ranks of reserve labor, racialism was reattired so that it might once again take its place among the inventory of labor disciplines. — Cedric J. Robinson, Black Marxism_ The Making of the Black…, 883

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • XREF: Connects to Robinson’s earlier claim (Ch 7) that racial differential reward stabilized capitalism, and to the terracing metaphor he develops.
  • QUESTION: Rainboro’s either/or framing — democracy-destroys-property or property-destroys-democracy — is a useful lens worth comparing to later Black Marxist readings of the same moment.

Broader Connections