Postwar human rights and neoliberal orders began from deep disagreement over welfare and planning.

Evidence

In 1947, the divergences between those who drafted the UDHR and the neoliberals of Mont Pèlerin were more significant than their convergences. While both were concerned with threats to human dignity and liberty in the wake of World War II, their solutions differed markedly: the human rights delegates adopted an extensive list of social and economic rights, while the neoliberals depicted state welfare and planning as totalitarian threats to ‘Western civilisation’. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 12

Categorization

  • XREF: Challenges the common narrative that human rights and neoliberalism were always allied; useful against both triumphalist histories of each. — connects to: Neoliberals actively shaped the postwar human rights discourse that later legitimized markets — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 40; Human rights discourse flourished alongside welfare-state retrenchment and anti-revolutionary politics — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 8; Postwar social-democratic welfare concerns displaced market faith, alarming both neoliberals and conservative diplomats. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 142 (+7 more)

Broader Connections