Post-capitalism must be globally coordinated, not a return to village scale.
Evidence
There’s no reason to think that mass production is just a feature of capitalism. You know we’ve got robots and stuff. This is one of the concrete challenges about how we would construct an economy without capitalism. The difference between me and my line of and certain kinds of anarchistic approaches, I suppose, is that I just agree with Marx, where the global triumph of capitalism is the pre-condition for post-capitalism. If capitalism is global, then we need also to be global or sufficiently global. It’s not like capitalism operates by global government, but it has sufficient systems to coordinate its activities around the world which minimise the effectiveness of anti-capitalist struggle. I think we need similar systems of global coordination, and I think that can involve resource management so that we most effectively use it, so resources are used in the most effective way. I think condemning us back into this world of literary dark ages, where we’re in tiny villages and we have a limited sense of the world around us is a horrific prospect. I still maintain a hope of a rationally organised post-capitalist civilisation. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 2202
Categorization
- XREF: Echoes the accelerationism debate around Srnicek/Williams and Fisher’s own political trajectory in k-punk writings; also the tension between localism and rational planning central to modernist planning literature. — connects to: Post-capitalist politics must coordinate autonomous struggles without centralizing them — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 1588; Coordination, not normative commitment, sustains social order in many regimes. — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 713; Overcoming capitalism alone would not prevent new forms of domination — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 1568 (+4 more)
- SHARE: For someone into post-capitalist economics / accelerationism discussions — Fisher’s insistence that global coordination systems, not village-scale retreat, define genuine anti-capitalism.
Broader Connections
- Decentralised coordination need not mean Stalinist centralisation
#qualifies(0.79) — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 2231 - Post-capitalist politics must coordinate autonomous struggles without centralizing them
#qualifies(0.75) — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 1588 - Overcoming capitalism alone would not prevent new forms of domination
#complicates(0.74) — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 1568 - Only a global socialist redistribution can remedy backward-capitalist poverty
#corroborates(0.73) — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 1341 - Coordination, not normative commitment, sustains social order in many regimes.
#expands(0.72) — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 713 - Integration into global capitalism reinforces, not relieves, the periphery’s subordination
#complicates(0.72) — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 292