Plasticity is suppleness that is neither passion nor passivity

Evidence

Such a discourse – where the times meet and intersect – is beholden to the very thing it is trying to describe: that speculative suppleness which is neither passion nor passivity, but plasticity. β€” Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 290

Categorization

  • DEFINE: The key negation defining plasticity: neither passion (receptivity) nor passivity β€” a speculative suppleness the discourse must itself embody.
  • XREF: The metacircular demand β€” discourse beholden to what it describes β€” resonates with the plastic brain as both organ and metaphor for its own theorizing. β€” connects to: Freud never found the death drive’s form because he stripped destruction of plasticity β€” Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain…, 4097; Plasticity names the negativity that is time’s gift of form β€” Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 169; Plasticity means both receiving and giving form, unlike mere malleability β€” Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 39 (+10 more)

Broader Connections