Plasticity inverts the Greek form-creation into the becoming-accidental of essence

Evidence

The Greek concept of ‘form-creation’ (FormtĂ€tigkeit) assumes that selfdetermination is to be thought in terms of the becoming essential of the accident which ïŹnds sensuous representation in the ‘exemplary individual’. On the other hand, the modern concept of plasticity seems to join itself with a concept of self-determination conceived as the becoming accidental of essence, the very development in which the fundamental signiïŹcance of the Incarnation is expressed. Kenosis is the movement through which God, by positing Himself in exteriority and becoming alien to Himself, achieves the fulïŹlment of His being and becomes at once predicate and accident. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 859

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Core definitional contrast: Greek FormtĂ€tigkeit = becoming-essential-of-accident; modern plasticity = becoming-accidental-of-essence, expressed via kenosis.
  • XREF: This is the pivotal definitional pivot of the entire book’s thesis — connects directly to the reader’s goal of grounding plasticity in Hegel and linking to brain plasticity work. — connects to: Greek culture’s wholeness is only graspable through the ideal of sculpture; Divine negativity manifests plasticity, not lack or passivity — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,
, 759; Plasticity names the dialectical union of form-seizure and form-annihilation. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,
, 247 (+4 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The inversion of accident/essence via kenosis is the book’s central speculative move, dense enough to sit with for days.

Broader Connections