Plasticity and habit define man’s place between animal and divine limits

Evidence

The analysis of noetic plasticity and of the role that habit plays in it will allow us to shed new light on the question of the ‘the proper of man (le propre de l’homme)’ and of the limits, animal and divine, that reserve for him his place. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 317

Categorization

  • XREF: Man defined by limits against animal and divine recalls Bataille and the proper of man debates; also connects to the reader’s brain work via habit as embodied plasticity. — connects to: Man defines himself as human by contrast with animal irrationality; Human habit conceals its own habitual character, whereas animal habit does not — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 551; Divine negativity manifests plasticity, not lack or passivity — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 759 (+8 more)

Broader Connections