phs simultaneously particularized and universalized its white male subjectivity

Evidence

The hegemonic white, bourgeois, male self identifies its particularity with a universal subjectivity, albeit in this instance a historically specified and localized subjectivity of ”this generation” of American students. This is precisely the universal white, male, bourgeois European subject of modernity called into question and repudiated by postmodern/postcolonial epistemologies of situatedness and politics of subjectivity and particularity. — Marianne DeKoven, Utopia Limited, 452

Categorization

• XREF: Chains to the book’s running thesis on modern-particular universal subjectivity vs postmodern situatedness; also the Marxist-universal-male-signifier motif. — connects to: The Statement self-consciously revised constitutional universalism toward generational particularity. — Marianne DeKoven, Utopia Limited: The Sixties and the…, 442; Racial homogenization is the necessary precondition for objectification and enmity — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 708; Outward racial rigidity masks internally contradictory individual subjectivities

Broader Connections

• Racial homogenization is the necessary precondition for objectification and enmity #expands (0.75) — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 708
• Outward racial rigidity masks internally contradictory individual subjectivities #complicates (0.75)