Philosophy needs no artificial terminology because usage naturalizes foreign words

Evidence

Philosophy therefore stands in no need of a special terminology; true, some words have to be taken from foreign languages but these have already acquired through usage the right of citizenship in it (i.e., in the philosophical realm) – and an affected purism would be most out of place where it was the distinctive meaning which was of decisive importance. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1137

Categorization

• DEFINE: Establishes Hegel’s view that philosophical language is native idiom, not a technical Kunstsprache — a core definitional stance about philosophy’s medium.
• XREF: Connects to Anglophone debates about plain prose in academic writing and to the idea that jargon is borrowed but naturalized by use. — connects to: Reason itself requires a vocabulary beyond common usage. — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the…, 662; Every language is already speculative and philosophy need only work with its accidents — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1161; Hegel held that philosophy needs no special terminology beyond the philosopher’s native idiom — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1136
• recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source