Philology denied the Orient autonomous generation, permitting only artificial laboratory reproduction.
Evidence
For all of Renan’s effort was to deny Oriental culture the right to be generated, except artificially in the philological laboratory. A man was not a child of the culture; that dynastic conception had been too effectively challenged by philology. Philology taught one how culture is a construct, an articulation (in the sense that Dickens used the word for Mr. Venus’s profession in Our Mutual Friend), even a creation, but not anything more than a quasi-organic structure. — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 379
Categorization
Category: Causal Relationships
- DEFINE: The contrast between dynastic (organic, inherited) and construction-based (laboratory) views of culture is a key conceptual fork in the Orientalist toolkit.
Related
- Philology denied Oriental cultures organic generation, rendering them laboratory constructs (similarity 0.96)
- The philological laboratory gave Orientalism scholarly coherence while binding it to power (similarity 0.84)
- Renan solidified Orientalism by attaching it to philology (similarity 0.83)
- Philology’s elite esotericism served as a vehicle for racial hierarchies (similarity 0.83)
- Orientalist philology fabricates lifelike biographies of dead cultures to serve imperial science (similarity 0.83)
- Orientalist science functions as an ego-driven fiction of European dominion. (similarity 0.82)
- Rebutting Orientalism with reverse essentialism would reproduce the same intellectual failure. (similarity 0.80)
- Orientalism is studied via its internal consistency, not its correspondence to a real Orient (similarity 0.79)
- Orientalist training typically converted initial fascination into a debunking project (similarity 0.79)
- Latent Orientalism produced a gendered, patriarchal framing of the Orient (similarity 0.79)
- Orientalism’s denigration of its subject creates an inner contradiction for scholars who study it (similarity 0.79)
- Orientalist academic disciplines and the colonial corporation share one structure of thought (similarity 0.78)
- Orientalism was a project of power and culture, not merely an academic enterprise (similarity 0.78)
- Orientalist scholarship presents constructed artifacts as natural accounts of dead cultures. (similarity 0.78)
- Orientalism holds unmatched philological access to the Other’s texts (similarity 0.78)