People prioritize problems physically close to their homes over even larger distant threats.

Evidence

It’s important to realize that the great dangers in life and in literature are not necessarily the most spectacular. Another mistake frequently made by young writers is to think that they can best introduce drama into their stories by way of murderers, chase scenes, crashes, and vampires, the external stock dangers of pulp and TV. In fact, all of us know that the most profound impediments to our desire usually lie close to home, in our own bodies, personalities, friends, lovers, and families. More people will suffer a parent’s neglect than a stranger’s violence; fewer will die from a gunshot than a heart attack; more passion is destroyed at the breakfast table than in a time warp. — Janet Burroway; Elizabeth Stuckey-French; Ned Stuckey-French, Writing Fiction, Tenth Edition, 416 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• corroborated: 5 independent passages support this claim
• XREF: connects to: The most profound dramatic dangers lie close to home, not in spectacle. — Janet Burroway; Elizabeth Stuckey-French; Ned Stuckey-French, Writing Fiction, Tenth Edition: A Guide…, 416; Volunteers classify nearby catastrophic hazards as ‘not close to home’ — Nina Eliasoph, “Close to home”: The work of avoiding…, 20

Related

• The most profound dramatic dangers lie close to home, not in spectacle. (similarity 0.95)

Broader Connections

• The most profound dramatic dangers lie close to home, not in spectacle. #corroborates (0.78) — Janet Burroway; Elizabeth Stuckey-French; Ned Stuckey-French, Writing Fiction, Tenth Edition, 416