Partisan conflicts shaped the early structure of the federal judiciary

Evidence

Advocates of state power, however, opposed the creation of circuit court judges, fearing that increasing the number of federal judges would permit more cases to be routed to federal courts. When Congress finally did create circuit judges in 1801, the partisan fashion in which it proceeded virtually guaranteed that the reform would not last. After having lost the election of 1800, President John Adams and the lame-duck Federalists who controlled Congress pushed through legislation that abolished circuit riding and created judgeships for each circuit. Adams then proceeded to appoint Federalists to all the new positions. According to legend, Adams signed the commissions for these “midnight judges” late into the last night of his presidency. Incoming president Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican Party were outraged, and in 1802, Congress—now controlled by Jefferson’s party—abolished the new judgeships and reinstituted circuit riding. — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 234

Categorization

  • XREF: Links to Marbury v. Madison (1803), the canonical case growing directly out of the 1801 judgeship fight. — connects to: Partisan judicial confirmation battles stem from structural features of the appointment process — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 507; The Judiciary Act of 1789 fixed the federal courts’ three-level structure — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 349; Parties organize political conflict rather than merely reflecting preexisting disagreements — Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum, A Lot of People Are Saying: The New…, 193 (+5 more)

Broader Connections