Partial concessions from negotiated protest deals split reformist from radical left factions

Evidence

After negotiations, they got nine out of the ten things they asked for—but they didn’t stop the bus rate hike. This opened a split on the young left in Brazil. For the student leaders and the PCdoB, the movement had used their leverage to get as much as they could, and this was a victory. For the autonomist left, the more anarchist and anti-bureaucratic youth, the Communists had done what Stalinists and hierarchical political parties always do—they had spoken for people they had no right to speak for, and they had sold out the street movement in service of maintaining a cozy relationship with politicians. — Vincent Bevins, If We Burn, 145

Categorization

  • XREF: Previews the book’s core theme (Bevins chapter one) that protest gains get absorbed/contained; also echoes the law-merchant material on commitment and factional credibility dynamics. — connects to: Successful racial reforms fragmented protest movements into reformist and radical currents — Michael Omi, Howard Winant, Racial Formation in the United States, 168; Left factions failed to unite because their strategies were mutually contradictory — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 132; A semi-revolutionary juncture can yield negotiated compromise rather than overthrow — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 587 (+3 more)

Broader Connections